A Collection of Posts by Ryan M. Maes...

Bitterness and Belittlement: How Resentment and Contempt Destroy Relationships

"A woman who conceals her emotions and says 'Nothing's wrong,' rather than being open-hearted and honest, will begin to harbor bitter resentment. Then, after resentment has conceived, it gives birth to contempt; and contempt, when it is full-grown, brings forth death: the death of the relationship."
— The God Pill

Resentment

Definition: Resentment refers to the feeling of displeasure or indignation stemming from being wronged or mistreated, either perceived or actual. It often arises from an injustice or unfairness, such as being overlooked, mistreated, or wronged.

Characteristics:

Prolonged Emotion: Resentment can linger for a long time, sometimes even for years.
Passive: It is often held internally and may not be explicitly expressed.
Rooted in Past Events: Typically arises from past events or situations.
Internal Struggle: May involve holding onto grudges or not being able to let go of past hurts.

Example: Holding onto anger about a spouse's blunder or betrayal that happened years ago.

"Be kind to one another, tenderhearted, forgiving one another, as God in Christ forgave you."
— Ephesians 4:32 (ESV)

Contempt

Definition: Contempt is a feeling that something or someone is not worthy of any respect or approval. In relationships, it often surfaces as a sense of superiority over one's partner and may include mockery, sarcasm, or disdain.

Characteristics:

Disrespectful: It involves looking down upon or devaluing the other person.
Active Expression: Often expressed through sarcasm, eye-rolling, mockery, or derisive language.
Destructive: Considered one of the most harmful emotions in a relationship.
Rooted in Present Perception: Arises from current feelings of superiority or disdain.

Example: Mocking your partner's achievements or belittling their emotions.

"As the Ark of the Lord entered the City of David, Michal, the daughter of Saul, looked down from her window. When she saw King David leaping and dancing before the Lord, she was filled with contempt for him. She said in disgust, 'How distinguished the king of Israel looked today, shamelessly exposing himself to the servant girls like any vulgar person might do!'"
— 2 Samuel 6:16, 20 (NLT)

In Relationships

Resentment can be a silent killer in relationships as it may be held internally and not communicated, leading to a slow decay of the relationship quality.

Contempt, on the other hand, is overtly damaging and is often cited as one of the strongest predictors of divorce, according to various relationship experts, including Dr. John Gottman. It erodes the respect partners have for each other and can lead to an outright breakdown of the relationship.

Both emotions, if left unchecked, can spell certain doom for the relationship and require prudence, awareness, and a sound mind to effectively navigate through them. It's critical to recognize and address these red flags early on to protect yourself and safeguard the relationship.

"Women, being the calculating gender, know all too well to hit the gym months prior to a break up—she's not getting in shape for you, she's getting ready to hit the ground running with the next guy she'll be f*cking."
— Rollo Tomassi

✠ P.S. If your home is loud, chaotic, and tense, do not blame "stress"—name the vacancy. When headship collapses, disorder fills the gap. The Kingdom Council 🏛️—Brotherhood of Kings sets the standard: boundaries first, enforcement second, peace as the outcome. Because when the king abdicates—someone else takes the throne.

👇

Rule Your Home ➜

ACTION STEPS

✅ SUBSCRIBE ON YOUTUBE—Truth They Won't Preach on Sunday 🔔

✅ JOIN NOW—Instant Access to Our Free Men's Group ✊

✅ SUPPORT OUR MISSION—Spread Truth. Build Men. 🙏

⚠️ Stop drifting. Start building.
Join The Kingdom Council—or get personalized video feedback directly from me ↗️

Stealth and Strategy: Spiritual Warfare in the Digital Age

By Ryan M. Maes Leave a Comment

Navigating the modern social media landscape while upholding freedom of speech and biblical ideals is quickly becoming a form of art. We must know what to say, when to say it, and 👉 HOW TO SAY IT 👈.

If we are too overt, our enemy is quick to silence us because evil hates TRUTH. We must operate from the shadows, in the unseen places, beneath the surface—like ninjas.

Subtext, subtle undertones, and covert operations are critical in crafting and expressing our message.

In this battle, checkers simply won't do. To combat the darkness, we need a 4D chessboard.

"For we wrestle not against flesh and blood, but against principalities, against powers, against the rulers of the darkness of this world, against spiritual wickedness in high places."
— Ephesians 6:12 (KJV)

Tips & Strategies from the 48 Laws of Power

Law 3: Conceal Your Intentions

This law suggests that you should not reveal your true intentions or strategies to others. By appearing less knowledgeable or aware than you actually are, you can sometimes gain an advantage.

Law 4: Always Say Less Than Necessary

This law advises that you should avoid talking too much, as excessive words and explanations can weaken your position. Instead, be concise and strategic with your words. By saying less, you create an aura of mystery and intrigue, which can make you appear more powerful and in control in various situations. This law emphasizes the importance of mastering the art of silence and choosing your words carefully to maintain an air of authority and influence.

Law 21: Play a Sucker to Catch a Sucker - Seem Dumber Than Your Mark

In short, this law advises that it can be advantageous to feign ignorance or play the fool in certain situations. By appearing less intelligent or knowledgeable than others, you can often sway them to underestimate you, leading them to reveal more information or making them more susceptible to your influence.

Law 35: Master the Art of Timing

Timing is crucial in the pursuit of power. Recognize when to act, when to wait, and when to strike. Your ability to gauge the right moment can make the difference between success and failure. Avoid being too early or too late; instead, seize opportunities when they are most advantageous.

Law 36: Disdain Things You Cannot Have: Ignoring Them is the Best Revenge

The less interest you take in things that irritate you, the more superior you seem. By acknowledging your enemy, you give their existence credibility and, therefore, power.

Law 38: Think as You Like, But Behave Like Others

This law advises that while you should maintain your individuality and personal thoughts, it is often wise to conform to societal norms and expectations in your behavior. People tend to feel uncomfortable around those who openly defy conventions or act too differently. By appearing to conform while secretly pursuing your own goals, you can navigate social situations more effectively and gain influence. This law suggests that a degree of subtlety and strategic conformity can help you maintain an edge and avoid unnecessary conflicts.

Law 48: Assume Formlessness

Be flexible, fluid, and unpredictable—formless—so your opponents can't get a fix on you and figure out how to respond. When you look and behave in conventional ways that your enemy can grasp, you're easy to attack.

"Behold, I send you out as sheep in the midst of wolves; so be shrewd as serpents and innocent as doves."
— Matthew 10:16 (NASB 1995)

✠ P.S. If overthinking is killing your confidence, this is not caution—it is avoidance. Men do not hesitate because they lack courage; they hesitate because nothing punishes delay. This brotherhood trains you to cut hesitation and demand decisive action—inside The Kingdom Council 🏛️. Because a man who will not act decisively will be decided for.

👇

Step Inside ➜

⚠️ Stop drifting. Start building.
Join The Kingdom Council—or get personalized video feedback directly from me ↗️

Mastering Power: The Thin Line Between Control and Domination

By Ryan M. Maes Leave a Comment

"A man establishes rules and boundaries. He is in control, not controlling; dominant, not domineering. He disagrees but is not disagreeable. He is always firm but fair—kind, not easy."
— The God Pill

"Controlling" and "in control" are related concepts but carry different connotations and are utilized in various contexts.

"Controlling" typically refers to an overbearing manner of directing others, while "in control" implies the ability to manage or handle situations effectively and calmly.

A controlling man dictates every aspect of his relationship, whereas a man in control subtly orchestrates situations and events so that intended outcomes appear to fall into place naturally, all by themselves.

A man in control is CONFIDENT and COMPETENT, while a controlling man is not.

Controlling

Definition: Imposing influence over; issuing commands, ultimatums, and sometimes threats.
Connotation: Often has a negative implication, stemming from insecurity or doubt, suggesting excessive or oppressive direction or regulation.
Example: He has a controlling personality, always dictating what others should do.

In Control

Definition: Having the power to manage or guide; having restraint.
Connotation: Generally positive, suggesting stability, competence, confidence, and the ability to effectively lead.
Example: Even in heated arguments, he remains in control and handles situations calmly.

"Obligated compliance never leads to genuine desire."
— Red Pill Maxim

"Let each one of you love his wife as himself, and let the wife see that she respects her husband."
— Ephesians 5:33 (KJV)

✠ P.S. If you are tired of letting boundaries slide and paying for it later, this is not kindness—it is abdicated authority. Men do not lose control because they are too harsh; they lose it because they refuse to enforce order at the first sign of disorder. This brotherhood exists to equip men to reassert masculine headship under Biblical authority—inside The Kingdom Council 🏛️. Because where authority wanes, chaos reigns.

👇

Enter The Kingdom Council ➜

⚠️ Stop drifting. Start building.
Join The Kingdom Council—or get personalized video feedback directly from me ↗️

The Argument from Epistemological Necessity: Understanding the Trustworthiness of the Mind

By Ryan M. Maes Leave a Comment

"Two things fill the mind with ever new and increasing admiration and awe, the more often and steadily we reflect upon them: the starry heavens above me and the moral law within me."
― Immanuel Kant, Critique of Practical Reason

In modern thought, a pressing question has emerged: Can we trust our minds to interpret the world accurately? This debate has prompted some to question whether there's a definitive OBJECTIVE TRUTH or reality.

Enlightenment philosophers, such as Hume and Kant, were among the first to voice these doubts; they challenged the trustworthiness of our minds.

For example, we often believe every event has a cause, but can we prove it? We use these beliefs to make sense of everything, yet we can't prove them. We rely on these assumptions to understand anything at all.

Hume argued that we can't rely solely on our experiences to understand the world. He believed that to interpret our experiences, we must assume nature always behaves consistently (i.e., the uniformity of nature).

However, when he tried to prove this consistency using his experiences and observations, he encountered a CIRCULAR PROBLEM: he couldn't justify the reliability of his assumptions by observing the world, yet he had to trust the reliability of his assumptions to make sense of his observations.

So, according to Hume, our observations alone can't justify our beliefs about the world.

"We also have the prophetic message as something completely reliable, and you will do well to pay attention to it, as to a light shining in a dark place, until the day dawns and the morning star rises in your hearts."
— 2 Peter 1:19 (NIV)

"O Timothy, keep that which is committed to thy trust, avoiding profane and vain babblings, and oppositions of science falsely so called: Which some professing have erred concerning the faith."
— 1 Timothy 6:20 (KJV)

But consider this: What if our minds were intentionally crafted by a LOVING CREATOR to comprehend the world? If so, there would be a natural alignment between our cognitive processes and the world's structure.

This perspective is central to modern scientific thought. Renowned scientists like Newton, Boyle, and Kepler believed there were patterns to be understood because our minds had been made in the image of the same RATIONAL Creator who had built rationality, design, pattern, and lawful order into the cosmos.

Given that our minds were shaped in the image of this LOGICAL CREATOR, they argued that we are intrinsically capable of decoding the world's mysteries.

What a profound insight!

Praise be to God, the Lord of all truth, who shines light in dark places and grants WISDOM and UNDERSTANDING to all who earnestly call upon the wonder of His glorious name!

"I'm a mathematician by background and a linguist. I love language, and mathematics is a very sophisticated language, but I love natural languages as well. It seems to me that where this fits together best is first in the fact that we can do science, in the sense that there is a rational intelligibility to the universe, which is the foundation of modern science and is a legacy of the biblical worldview. So, the mathematical describability Einstein talked about—he couldn't imagine any genuine scientist without faith in that. The axiom for doing science is to believe the universe is intelligible. But if you ask for the rationale behind that—why do we believe the universe is intelligible—it bears the imprint of a Creator. And I see that at the level of mathematics, in its capacity to, at least in part, give us a handle on what's out there, and also in biology, where we have, at the heart of every living cell, the longest word we've ever found: the genetic code. And all of that leads me to formulate it as follows: we live in a word-based universe, and that's the key of the Logos for me."
— John Lennox, Professor of Mathematics at Oxford University

✠ P.S. If doubt is creeping in and your faith feels lukewarm, the issue is not lack of evidence—it is pressure testing your convictions. Men do not drift from truth because God is unclear; they drift because obedience becomes costly. This brotherhood exists to refuse compromise and uphold Biblical authority—inside The Kingdom Council 🏛️—Brotherhood of Kings. Because truth you negotiate is truth you surrender.

👇

Join the Fellowship ➜

⚠️ Stop drifting. Start building.
Join The Kingdom Council—or get personalized video feedback directly from me ↗️

Everybody Has a Price…

By Ryan M. Maes Leave a Comment

Men are no strangers to conditions, requirements, and personal biases, just like women.

Namely, men don't want a "strong," independent woman; they want an agreeable one (1 Peter 3:4). They desire a feminine and submissive woman (Tit. 2:4-5; Col. 3:18-19) who is cooperative and pleasant (Gen. 2:18; Eccles. 9:9; Prov. 31:29). She must be youthful, beautiful, and pure, not promiscuous (Gen. 24:16; Esth. 2:2; 1 Kings 1:2; Esth. 2:7; Prov. 5:19; 2 Sam. 11:2; Tit. 2:5; 2 Cor. 11:2). She must respect her husband (Eph. 5:33) and submit to him in all things (Eph. 5:22-24). Moreover, she should be a helper, not a hindrance (Prov. 14:1).

The truth is, in our sin-fallen nature, we 👉 ALL 👈 have conditions.

Women have conditions, men have conditions—

—EVERYBODY HAS CONDITIONS

Conditions are a fact of life.

Idealistic love for love's sake exists only in Disney fairytales—

—and most of those are gay anyway.

"Women are fundamentally incapable of loving a man in the way that a man expects to be loved by a woman. That's not to say women can't love men. It's to say that love is a bonus to, not the incentive for, a woman to marry."
— Rollo Tomassi

✠ P.S. If women keep testing and winning, it is because your frame does not hold under pressure. When masculine authority softens, feminine control fills the vacuum. The Kingdom Council 🏛️ trains you to reestablish frame and navigate intergender dynamics without submission. Because power never disappears—it only changes hands.

👇

Enter The Kingdom Council ➜